I asked the normal culprits, Cassandra Carr, Cara Carnes, Anya Richards, Piper Trace and Julianne Keller. All are weekly commenters on the DtM posts and are part of the Cabal of Hotness.
Preference on our manscape down stairs. Do you ladies have a pubic preference, Fully hairless, trimmed or something out of the 70's Why?
Cassandra: Trimmed is fine with me. I'd prefer it not be a jungle, but no hair sometimes looks a little odd. Why? It's neater. Plus, just like for you guys when you go down on us, it's a more pleasant experience if you're not being suffocated by hair. ;-)
Cara: Hairless is best, trimmed is good. Why? I have an oral fetish and would prefer my focus to be on the reason I'm down there:) I don't like getting distracted by awkward smells or having to use my kneeling time foraging through a forest for the manly treasures.
Anya: I like trimmed, but hairless balls are awfully nice, because there's nothing worse than that feeling of a hair caught at the back of my throat. Very unsexy to have to stop and hack like a cat with a hairball.
Piper: Definitely shaved balls and neatly trimmed short pubes above the balls. Lots of reasons: 1) your penis looks bigger 2) I get less hair caught in my mouth 3) hair is kinda gross and is more likely to retain...smells 4) I'm more likely to put your balls in my mouth if they are shaved. Well...maybe not YOUR balls, but you get what I mean. LOL :) But not completely shaved because...well I think a little hair is just manly.
Julianne:
I'd prefer for him to have his balls shaved and/or shaved or trimmed around the penis. If I'm going to be giving a blow job, I want as little hair as possible. Nothing breaks the mood more than having to stop and spit out a hair or try to pick it out of my teeth. I also think less hair is very sexy.
I'd prefer for him to have his balls shaved and/or shaved or trimmed around the penis. If I'm going to be giving a blow job, I want as little hair as possible. Nothing breaks the mood more than having to stop and spit out a hair or try to pick it out of my teeth. I also think less hair is very sexy.
Is it true, that you know within the first couple of minutes of meeting a guy that you know whether or not you would fuck him?
Cassandra: Eh. It depends. Am I looking for a one-night-stand? Then probably. Am I looking longer-term? Then probably not. But if the guy sends up any red flags during that first few minutes he's done for. What do I mean by red flags? Rudeness, condescension (yes, some men still condescend to women), arrogance, cluelessness...
Cara: Yes, and no. For one night stands or one time hookups based on physical chemistry, it's definitely true. But getting to know someone on a mental level brings on a whole new byplay that deepens an attraction, and that takes a bit more time IMHO.
Anya: Not always. Usually you know whether you're attracted to a man almost immediately but whether you'd actually fuck him... no. Sometimes a man has to grow on you a bit or you have to get a bunch of booze in you :) Or sometimes you think, "Wow, I'd fuck him" and then he opens his mouth or picks his nose or something and you wouldn't touch him with a ten-foot pole after that.
Piper: Absolutely not! A million times NO! At least not for me. For me SO MUCH of your attractiveness depends on personality and chemistry!! I've met many super-handsome, seemingly fun guys who very quickly became HIGHLY unattractive as I got to know him, and vice versa. Often a guy who doesn't immediately rev a woman's engine can turn it completely around if she realizes all the sneaky goddamn sexiness hiding under the surface! And honestly, I find that even sexier...those sneaky-sexy guys. Like they're hiding a delicious secret, and YOU discovered it! And then sometimes you find both. When I met my hubby, I found him to be very attractive AND he had sneaky sexiness on top of it! So I married him. :)
Julianne: No. For me it's mostly about the chemistry between us. If there isn't any chemistry, it's safe to say that I probably won't be fucking him. Sometimes, it's all about the timing. If I'm just looking for a one night stand type of thing, a few minutes is all I need. But if I'm wanting to really get to know him, and possibly start a relationship, that's going to take a lot longer to know. I might be dreaming of having some hot sex with him when I first meet a guy, odds are I truly won't know until I get to know him better.
Why is it taboo for a woman to be seen or show off her bra and panties in public but be OK to wear a swimsuit that has the same coverage of less?
Cassandra: We have no idea. Honestly. Noooo idea. Not that I want to do that anyway, but it does seem sort of silly.
Cara: Ramrod, I totally want to know the answer to this myself. Personally, for the sake of humanity, I wouldn't venture out in either but I do find it interesting myself. Perhaps it's the psychological assignment we've given the articles of clothing. Maybe we're regressing our minds back to a time where ladies didn't show their girlie wears to anyone.
Anya: That's a question for the ages... and my husband and I just had an argument over it...thanks Ramrod! Here's the thing--society has a really dumb way of artificially making things more important than they need to be. If you call something "underwear" then society says it is to be worn UNDER the clothes, is to be kept private and will be overly titillating if exposed. Now, take something just about the same size, but lined so it doesn't go see-through when wet and call it swimwear, and suddenly you can tear off the sarong and expose it all you want. *shrug* I don't make the rules and half the time I don't understand them either.
Piper:
#1: I have no idea
#2: the only reason women AREN'T running around in bras and panties all the time is because it's "against the rules". Not that every woman is into that, but there's a reason all the sluts come out at Halloween...because sluts like us are FINALLY allowed to let our freak flags fly! Obviously, I'm pro-slut. :)
Julianne: First of all, I think some women don't have any problems showing off their bras and panties. I also think it has a lot to do with what generation you're from, or how you are raised. It's not ladylike to let your undergarments show. Mostly, I think it's because the bra and panties are considered under garments and not meant to be seen or show through clothing. A swimsuit on the other hand, is designed to seen that way.
I want to thank the lovely ladies that answered so openly above:
All are weekly commenters on the DtM posts and are part of the Cabal of Hotness.